On 09 November the Government published a new Code of Practice and a draft Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill with the aim of tackling accrued rent arrears for businesses which were forced to close or (it seems) operate under restrictions during the pandemic.

The new Code of Practice

The Code of Practice has a wider application than the new Bill. It should be used in relation to any rent arrears accrued since March 2020 as a result of the pandemic, and sets out best practice guidance to assist landlords and tenants in resolving disputes relating to such arrears. The intention is that the parties should try to resolve these disputes before the Bill comes into force. The Code is guidance only, not binding legislation, and replaces the earlier version from June 2020, revised in April 2021.

The Code contains a helpful summary of the enforced closures and restrictions, and those businesses affected, together with a helpful summary of the arbitration process (see below).

Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill

The new Bill provides for the ring-fencing of arrears of rent (including service charge, insurance costs and interest) owed by business tenants affected by forced closure and/or it seems restrictions upon trading/operation during the “protected period” (defined to commence 21 March 2020 and ending no later than 18 July 2021) and establishes a binding arbitration system to determine what happens to that ring-fenced debt if the landlord and tenant fail to agree (more below).

The message remains that the new measures do not present an excuse not to pay, and if a tenant is able to pay without borrowing or restructuring, the tenant should meet its payment obligations in full. Landlords and tenants continue to be encouraged to negotiate agreement over Covid arrears, but if agreement cannot be reached there will be continued protection from enforcement in relation to ring-fenced arrears, and the new binding arbitration process to fall back on.


References to arbitration can be made by landlord or tenant within six months of the Bill becoming law, and must include a formal proposal for resolution. The other party may make a counter proposal, and further revisions/offers are possible during the process.

The arbitrator must consider whether the tenant`s business is viable, or would become viable if relief from payment was granted, and then consider whether any relief should be granted. The aim of the award should be to restore or preserve the viability of the tenant`s business, but only to the extent that is consistent with maintaining the landlord`s solvency. The relief that the arbitrator might award includes writing off all or part of the ring-fenced rent, and allowing up to two years to pay any part of it.

Although the party making the reference must pay the arbitration fees to the arbitrator up front, the arbitrator will apportion those fees in the subsequent award. Otherwise the parties must pay any costs they incur themselves in connection with the process.

The Government will approve arbitration bodies, and those bodies will maintain a list of suitable arbitrators. It remains to be seen what appetite there will be for taking on this role, and deciding issues including tenant viability and landlord solvency.

Extended Moratorium

The existing restrictions on forfeiture for non-payment of rent, the exercise of CRAR and the existing limited restrictions upon presenting winding up petitions will continue to apply beyond March 2022 in respect of ring-fenced arrears, from the date that the Bill becomes law, to the date that ends six months thereafter, or, where a reference to Arbitration is made, the date on which the Arbitration concludes (the “moratorium period”).

Additionally, the Bill provides that during this moratorium period, again in respect of ring-fenced debt:

  1. Landlords may not issue a debt claim; &
  2. Debt claims commenced after 10 November 2021 but before the day on which the Bill becomes law can be stayed (i.e. temporarily stopped), and any judgment entered in those claims cannot be enforced during the moratorium period; &
  3. Landlords may not draw down on rent deposits, and if a landlord has already done so, the tenant is not obliged to top up that rent deposit during the moratorium period; &
  4. Rent paid during the moratorium period must be applied first to any rent debt that is not ring-fenced; &
  5. Rent paid in the period after the end of relevant closure/restrictions, but before the date that the Bill becomes law, must be allocated first to any rent that is not ring-fenced before being allocated to any ring-fenced debt.


It is widely reported that the majority of commercial landlords and tenants have already reached agreement over how to share the pain of Covid-19 arrears. The new arbitration scheme is not intended to interfere with existing agreements, and is pitched as a last resort for those remaining landlords and tenants that thus far have been unable to agree.

There is no doubt that the proposed new legislation is a significant piece of statutory intervention in an industry where (notwithstanding insolvency processes) landlords and tenants have traditionally been bound by the terms of their lease, which they freely negotiated.  This, on top of the Government`s proposed review of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1954, and proposed reforms to the business rates regime make for unprecedented times for owners and occupiers of commercial property.

Note: the draft Bill may be amended as it makes its way through parliament.

For more information please do get in touch with one of the Property Disputes team: Lee PearceJoe Brightman, Emma Jenkins, Molly FrankhamAmy Gibson or Rachel Bandrith.

More related updates